[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702151111250.11064@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:14:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/14] syslets: x86, add create_async_thread() method
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> +ENTRY(async_thread_helper)
> + CFI_STARTPROC
> + /*
> + * Allocate space on the stack for pt-regs.
> + * sizeof(struct pt_regs) == 64, and we've got 8 bytes on the
> + * kernel stack already:
> + */
> + subl $64-8, %esp
> + CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 64
Maybe a comment here would help in explaining why we do need space for the
extra pt_regs (on top of the one already allocated in do_fork()) ;)
It's not immediately clear that ret_from_fork and syscall_exit will issue
two nested RESTORE_REGS.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists