[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702151117460.11064@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:19:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 06/14] syslets: core, documentation
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:52:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
> > +The syslet atom is a small, fixed-size (44 bytes on 32-bit) piece of
> > +user-space memory, which is the basic unit of execution within the syslet
> > +framework. A syslet represents a single system-call and its arguments.
> > +In addition it also has condition flags attached to it that allows the
> > +construction of larger programs (syslets) from these atoms.
> > +
> > +Arguments to the system call are implemented via pointers to arguments.
>
> I've just thought, how x86/x86_64 problem is going to be solved for
> pointer size? Is it better to wire longs/pointers to 64 bits right now?
Compat code is gonna to be fun also for that (pointers to args, and "next"
chaining pointer).
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists