[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702161312460.28871@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:13:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for
paravirt_ops interface
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM. Xen does need some
> additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design
> choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables. This is where all
> the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.
It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of
page table methods in paravirt ops.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists