linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1171779357.4740.5.camel@ghreen.sphere>
Date:	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:15:57 -0600
From:	Rodney Gordon II <meff@...ox.com>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	"mdew ." <some.nzguy@...il.com>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
> 
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
> >>
> >> Apply to 2.6.20
> > 
> > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
> 
> Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench 
> benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
> 
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
> 
> --
> -ck

Here are some benches comparing 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian sid stock) and
2.6.20-ck1-mt1 (2.6.20-ck1 + sched-idleprio-1.11-2.0.patch)

I know it's not what was asked for, but it might be useful for review of
anyone using Debian kernels considering ck patches :)

Take a look.

-r
-- 
Rodney "meff" Gordon II -*- meff@...ox.com
Systems Administrator / Coder Geek -*- Open yourself to OpenSource

View attachment "2.6.18-4-686.log" of type "text/x-log" (2170 bytes)

View attachment "2.6.20-ck1-mt1.log" of type "text/x-log" (2173 bytes)