[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1171779613.4740.9.camel@ghreen.sphere>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:20:13 -0600
From: Rodney Gordon II <meff@...ox.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: ck@....kolivas.org, "mdew ." <some.nzguy@...il.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 00:15 -0600, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > mdew . writes:
> >
> > > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:
> > >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> > >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> > >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
> > >>
> > >> Apply to 2.6.20
> > >
> > > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
> >
> > Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench
> > benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
> >
> > http://interbench.kolivas.org
> >
> > --
> > -ck
>
> Here are some benches comparing 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian sid stock) and
> 2.6.20-ck1-mt1 (2.6.20-ck1 + sched-idleprio-1.11-2.0.patch)
>
> I know it's not what was asked for, but it might be useful for review of
> anyone using Debian kernels considering ck patches :)
>
> Take a look.
>
> -r
System specs by the way:
Pentium-D 830 3.0GHz Dualcore, 1.5GB RAM, 7200RPM 16MB Cache SATA3 using
AHCI w/ NCQ on.
--
Rodney "meff" Gordon II -*- meff@...ox.com
Systems Administrator / Coder Geek -*- Open yourself to OpenSource
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists