linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <16FF8A01-2020-45D8-AB4D-162345CB2653@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:07:26 -0800
From:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event


>   I
> *think* the patch is right, but picking the changes to the code and  
> watching
> its movement at the same time is making my head spin.

Really?  The only things that changed are the assignment from iocb- 
 >res (after testing pending_err) instead of the 'res' argument and  
the dprintk.

But, uh, sure.  If it's a burden I can respin it as two patches.   
Here they come!

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/