linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x49y7mt4vdd.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:48:14 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

==> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:38:35 -0800 (PST), Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com> said:

Zach> This addresses an oops reported by Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Zach> as archived at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/8/337.
[snip]
Zach> So this patch introduces a helper, aio_propogate_error(), 

...which is spelled incorrectly:  aio_propagate_error.

Zach> which queues post-submission errors in the iocb so that they are
Zach> given to the user completion event when aio_complete() is
Zach> finally called.

Ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it, either.

> +
> +	if (kiocbIsInserted(req))
> +		aio_ring_insert_entry(ctx, req);
> +

This confused me at first reading.  If it's inserted, then insert it.
Perhaps KIF_COMPLETED would be a better name?

> +/*
> + * This function is used to make sure that an error is communicated to
> + * userspace on iocb completion without stopping -EIOCBQUEUED from bubbling up
> + * to fs/aio.c from the place where it originated.
> + *
> + * If we have an existing -EIOCBQUEUED it must be returned all the way to
> + * fs/aio.c so that it doesn't double-complete the iocb along with whoever
> + * returned -EIOCBQUEUED..  In that case we put the new error in the iocb.  It
> + * will be returned to userspace *intead of* the first result code given to
> + * aio_complete().  Use this only for errors which must overwrite whatever the
> + * return code might have been.  The first non-zero new_err given to this
> + * function for a given iocb will be returned to userspace.
> + */
> +static inline int aio_propogate_error(struct kiocb *iocb, int existing_err,
> +				      int new_err)
> +{
> +	if (existing_err != -EIOCBQUEUED)
> +		return new_err;
> +	if (!iocb->ki_pending_err)
> +		iocb->ki_pending_err = new_err;
> +	return -EIOCBQUEUED;
> +}
> +

I think that we would ideally cancel the I/Os in flight since we are
going to throw away the results.  However, we don't exactly support
cancellation today.  So, I have no objection to this less optimal
solution.

-Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/