[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <46C10DE9-B203-4A1F-AF18-7E8A0A899EAF@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:57:09 -0800
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
> Zach> So this patch introduces a helper, aio_propogate_error(),
>
> ...which is spelled incorrectly: aio_propagate_error.
Man, I am batting 1000! Randy also made fun of my 'intead'.
> Zach> which queues post-submission errors in the iocb so that they are
> Zach> given to the user completion event when aio_complete() is
> Zach> finally called.
>
> Ugly, but I can't think of a better way to do it, either.
Yeah, this seemed to be the lesser of the available evils. We (Chris
and I, while in california) considered introducing a primitive to
have the submission path wait for aio_complete() to be called so that
it could just return the error. We also thought about turning EIOCB
{RETRY,QUEUED} into bits on the iocb instead of return codes that we
have to lovingly pass back up to fs/aio.c.
This seemed to be the least intrusive :/.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists