[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070220170335.GR6133@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:03:35 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:57:49PM +0300, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
> Zach> This addresses an oops reported by Leonid Ananiev
> <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
> Zach> as archived at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/8/337.
> ....
> Zach> This was tested by running O_DIRECT aio-stress concurrently with
> buffered reads
>
> The oops was with aio-stress only running in the loop
> WITHOUT buffered or mmaped IO which are patched and discussed now.
> Actually 47% aio is finished with EIO after patch.
I looked through the thread and couldn't find the aio-stress command
line used for the whole test. Could you please post it here?
If aio+dio is being used to extend the file, you'll get pages in the
page cache, which is hopefully why you're able to trigger the EIOs.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists