[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070220002853.GL6133@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:21:09PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:50:48PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > aio is not responsible for this particular synchronization. Those fixes
> > (if we make them) should come from other places. The patch is important
> > to get aio error handling right.
> >
> > I would argue that one common cause of the EIO is userland
> > error (mmap concurrent with O_DIRECT), and EIO is the correct answer.
>
> I disagree. That means that using the pagecache to synchronize things like
> the proposed online defragmentation will occasionally make O_DIRECT users
> fail. O_DIRECT doesn't prevent the sysadmin from copying files or other
> page cache uses, which implies that generating an error in these cases is
> horrifically broken. If only root could do it, I wouldn't complain, but
> this would seem to imply that user vs root holes still exist.
I'm working on this part in the placeholder patches. It's just a separate
problem from the aio code.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists