linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] use symbolic constants in generic lseek code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8458.1172057912@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:38:32 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, jeffpc@...efsipek.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use symbolic constants in generic lseek code 

Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com> wrote:

> Patch 1 fixes the case statements to use the symbolic constants in
> include/linux/fs.h, and should not be at all controversial.
>
> Patch 2 adds a SEEK_MAX and uses it to validate user arguments.  This makes
> the code a little cleaner and also enables future extensions (such as
> SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE).  If anyone has a problem with this, please speak up.

Seems reasonable.

Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/