linux-kernel - Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1: Resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45DC3018.7010704@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:42:16 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@....es>
CC:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1: Resume

Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 17:19, Jean Delvare va escriure:
>> Le Mardi 13 Février 2007 17:11, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
>>> A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 12:20, Jean Delvare va escriure:
>>> (...)
>>>
>>>>>> *If* the VT8251 needs the VIA IRQ quirk, then the attached patch
>>>>>> may help. Leopold, can you give it a try?
>>>>> Well, making your patch to the vanilla 2.6.20 the result is the same.
>>>>> The box doesn't boot. Always the same problem ....
>>>> If it's not a VIA IRQ problem, then there's nothing more I can do,
>>>> sorry. Someone else will have to look into the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Out of curiosity, with my patch applied, did you see any "VIA VLink IRQ
>>>> fixup" messages on the console?
>>> No :-(
>> OK, so maybe the VT8251 actually no longer needs the quirk. Thanks for
>> testing and reporting.
> 
> 
> Hi people,
>  
> arriving to this state. What do you recommend?
> 
> I have the box more or less working with irqpoll but with a lot of messages:
> APIC error on CPU0: 08(08)
> 
> and the box doesn't boot without the irqpoll option. Do you think that the 
> 2.6.21 have some kind of changes in this area?
> 
> Thank's for all for you patience and your messages.

I'm sorry but I'm clueless other than that it seems to be an irq routing
problem.

Any ideas, people?

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/