lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702211656.20120.lepalom@wol.es>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:56:18 +0100
From:	Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@....es>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1: Resume

A Dimecres 21 Febrer 2007 12:42, Tejun Heo va escriure:
> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 17:19, Jean Delvare va escriure:
> >> Le Mardi 13 Février 2007 17:11, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
> >>> A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 12:20, Jean Delvare va escriure:
> >>> (...)
> >>>
> >>>>>> *If* the VT8251 needs the VIA IRQ quirk, then the attached patch
> >>>>>> may help. Leopold, can you give it a try?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well, making your patch to the vanilla 2.6.20 the result is the same.
> >>>>> The box doesn't boot. Always the same problem ....
> >>>>
> >>>> If it's not a VIA IRQ problem, then there's nothing more I can do,
> >>>> sorry. Someone else will have to look into the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> Out of curiosity, with my patch applied, did you see any "VIA VLink
> >>>> IRQ fixup" messages on the console?
> >>>
> >>> No :-(
> >>
> >> OK, so maybe the VT8251 actually no longer needs the quirk. Thanks for
> >> testing and reporting.
> >
> > Hi people,
> >
> > arriving to this state. What do you recommend?
> >
> > I have the box more or less working with irqpoll but with a lot of
> > messages: APIC error on CPU0: 08(08)
> >
> > and the box doesn't boot without the irqpoll option. Do you think that
> > the 2.6.21 have some kind of changes in this area?
> >
> > Thank's for all for you patience and your messages.
>
> I'm sorry but I'm clueless other than that it seems to be an irq routing
> problem.
>
> Any ideas, people?

Now, I have tested the 2.6.21-rc1 with the same result. Not boot....
I have one doubt, and maybe Mr Garzik could answer it. The changes in the 
ahci.c and sata_via.c for the 2.6.16 that I commented in a previous mails are 
incorporated in the next versions? 
Because all of us has presumed that yes, are equal and maybe not .....

Regards,

Thank's for all your patience ....

Leo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ