[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702210951580.24344@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:53:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu, unionfs@...esystems.org, bunk@...sta.de,
hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slab: introduce krealloc
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> +void *krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + void *ret;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!p))
> + return kmalloc_track_caller(new_size, flags);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!new_size)) {
> + kfree(p);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kmalloc_track_caller(new_size, flags);
> + if (!ret)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + memcpy(ret, p, min(new_size, ksize(p)));
> + kfree(p);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(krealloc);
Well could you check ksize for the old object first and if ksize <= new
size then just skip the copy? I think this may allow you
to get rid of the ksize callers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists