linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] slab: introduce krealloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45DC8DA1.6030100@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:21:21 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu, unionfs@...esystems.org, bunk@...sta.de,
	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slab: introduce krealloc

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Well could you check ksize for the old object first and if ksize <= new 
> size then just skip the copy? I think this may allow you 
> to get rid of the ksize callers.

And not reallocate at all, right? I thought about that but then you 
wouldn't be able to use realloc() to make the buffer smaller.

			Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/