linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070221121351.35faf008.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:13:51 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:03:35 -0800
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id(), idle_at_tick = idle_cpu(cpu);

argh.  Please, do

	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
	int idle_at_tick = idle_cpu(cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/