linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1odnn1d7n.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:13:16 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
>> What is the status of:
>> 
>>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
>>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch
>
> That's mainly an Andi decision.  Let's cc him.
>
>> They fix a serious bug that causes machines to freeze up
>> or just run very slowly.
>> 
>> I'd like to see these in -stable if possible.
>
> They're not even in mainline yet.

If you don't have it you at least want the patch below.  It generally
makes the bug non-fatal.

I'm still working my way through possible fixes...  Although the
patch in question is close, and normally fixes it in my utmost
paranoia I can still find problems with it.

Eric


commit 2fb12a9bca5ad9aa6dcd2c639b4a7656a8843ef8
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 13 13:26:25 2007 +0100

    [PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector
    
    Occasionally the kernel has bugs that result in no irq being found for a
    given cpu vector.  If we acknowledge the irq the system has a good chance
    of continuing even though we dropped an irq message.  If we continue to
    simply print a message and not acknowledge the irq the system is likely to
    become non-responsive shortly there after.
    
    AK: Fixed compilation for UP kernels
    
    Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
    Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
    Cc: "Luigi Genoni" <luigi.genoni@...elli.com>
    Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/