[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HK8hU-0005Mq-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:49:12 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: staubach@...hat.com, hugh@...itas.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:51:52 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> > This patch makes writing to shared memory mappings update st_ctime and
> > st_mtime as defined by SUSv3:
> >
> > The st_ctime and st_mtime fields of a file that is mapped with
> > MAP_SHARED and PROT_WRITE shall be marked for update at some point
> > in the interval between a write reference to the mapped region and
> > the next call to msync() with MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC for that portion
> > of the file by any process. If there is no such call and if the
> > underlying file is modified as a result of a write reference, then
> > these fields shall be marked for update at some time after the
> > write reference.
> >
> > A new address_space flag is introduced: AS_CMTIME. This is set each
> > time a page is dirtied through a userspace memory mapping. This
> > includes write accesses via get_user_pages().
> >
> > Note, the flag is set unconditionally, even if the page is already
> > dirty. This is important, because the page might have been dirtied
> > earlier by a non-mmap write.
> >
> > This flag is checked in msync() and __fput(), and if set, the file
> > times are updated and the flag is cleared
> >
> > The flag is also cleared, if the time update is triggered by a normal
> > write. This is not mandated by the standard, but seems to be a sane
> > thing to do.
>
> Why is the flag checked in __fput()?
It's because of this bit in the standard:
If there is no such call and if the underlying file is modified
as a result of a write reference, then these fields shall be
marked for update at some time after the write reference.
It could be done in munmap/mremap, but it seemed more difficult to
track down all the places where the vma is removed. But yes, that may
be a nicer solution.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists