[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070222074624.GA9800@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:46:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>, balducci@...ts.it,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> The problem is that the p->last_ran value is not updated after a
> context switch. So a subsequent call to current_sched_time()
> calculates with a stale p->last_ran value, i.e. accounts the full
> time, which the task was scheduled away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> sched_info_switch(prev, next);
> if (likely(prev != next)) {
> - next->timestamp = now;
> + next->timestamp = next->last_ran = now;
ouch! nice catch. Also for v2.6.20.2 i think. 2.6.19 should be
unaffected.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists