[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070224163011.GB16509@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:30:11 +0100
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctls.h (Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.)
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> > > From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> > > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> > > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.
> > > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > > as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change
> > > to allow at least a couple arch-specific ioctl.h files to be
> > > massively simplified?
> >
> > And i wonder, why there is no generic ioctls.h, hm?
>
> beats me, but it seems that there are a *number* of arch-specific
> header files that could be treated this way -- a single generic file,
> allowing the small number of customizations that seem to be necessary
> across all architectures.
>
> but i figured i'd start with ioctl.h first and see where it went from
> there.
Indeed.
Thank you!
> --
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
> Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
> ========================================================================
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists