[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702241058140.19099@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:59:42 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctls.h (Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible
by adding conditionals.)
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.
> > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
>
> > as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change
> > to allow at least a couple arch-specific ioctl.h files to be
> > massively simplified?
>
> And i wonder, why there is no generic ioctls.h, hm?
beats me, but it seems that there are a *number* of arch-specific
header files that could be treated this way -- a single generic file,
allowing the small number of customizations that seem to be necessary
across all architectures.
but i figured i'd start with ioctl.h first and see where it went from
there.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists