| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:59:42 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> To: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: ioctls.h (Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.) On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > From: "Robert P. J. Day" > > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals. > > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST) > > > as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change > > to allow at least a couple arch-specific ioctl.h files to be > > massively simplified? > > And i wonder, why there is no generic ioctls.h, hm? beats me, but it seems that there are a *number* of arch-specific header files that could be treated this way -- a single generic file, allowing the small number of customizations that seem to be necessary across all architectures. but i figured i'd start with ioctl.h first and see where it went from there. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists