[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HKwCy-0005OM-FW@flower>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:41:00 +0100
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ioctls.h (Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.)
> From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.
> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
> as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change to
> allow at least a couple arch-specific ioctl.h files to be massively
> simplified?
And i wonder, why there is no generic ioctls.h, hm?
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists