[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:43:37 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB Elan FTDI: check for workqueue creation
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:10:05 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> I may be wrong, but a lot of the kernel code have static pointers
> initialized to NULL with explicit manner... More over I always thought
> that _static_ is not mean _initialized to zero_. I think _static_ is
> just the method to _hide_ variables in the file (as ANSI C describes).
> Am I wrong?
I'm afraid you are wrong here. Static variables are initialized on
zero in C, although I cannot provide you with a relevant quote from
a standard. Just trust me for now, and resubmit the patch without
the first segment... :-) You're clearly fixing a bug in it.
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists