linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB Elan FTDI: check for workqueue creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070224071225.GA10139@cvg>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:12:25 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel-list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB Elan FTDI: check for workqueue creation

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 05:43:37PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
| On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:10:05 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
| 
| > I may be wrong, but a lot of the kernel code have static pointers
| > initialized to NULL with explicit manner... More over I always thought
| > that _static_ is not mean _initialized to zero_. I think _static_ is
| > just the method to _hide_ variables in the file (as ANSI C describes).
| > Am I wrong?
| 
| I'm afraid you are wrong here. Static variables are initialized on
| zero in C, although I cannot provide you with a relevant quote from
| a standard. Just trust me for now, and resubmit the patch without
| the first segment... :-)  You're clearly fixing a bug in it.
| 
| -- Pete
| 

Hi Pete,

OK, I'll send a new one ;)

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/