linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-ck1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b637ec0b0702240412p531299ecn797fdef7e4c53e89@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:12:44 -0500
From:	"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	"Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	"ck mailing list" <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-ck1

On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:
> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.

Hi Con.
I usually don't pay a lot of attention to benchmarks. Responsiveness
under load is much important to me.

But this is nice: I use FC6 with initng as boot process manager. With
vanilla 2.6.20 boot process takes 21 to 23 seconds; with 2.6.20-ck1
(same config, of course), boot process takes 17 to 19 seconds.

So your patchset has become my patchset of choice.

Regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/