[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070224121816.GF22586@kernel.dk>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:18:16 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: A quick fio test (was Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3)
On Fri, Feb 23 2007, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:52:47PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Results:
> >
> > Engine Depth Bw (MiB/sec)
> > --------------------------------------------
> > libaio 1 441
> > syslet 1 574
> > sync 1 589
> > libaio 32 613
> > syslet 32 681
>
> Can we get runs with large I/Os, large I/O depths, and most
> importantly tons of processes? I can absolutely believe that syslets
> would compete well with one process on the system. But with 1000
> processes doing 1000s of blocking I/Os, I'd really be interested to see
> how that plays out.
Sure, I'll add this to the testing list for monday.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists