[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1172619412.3681.11.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:36:52 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 02:28 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Ugh. I know nothing, nothing, nothing about suspend. I'll try to guess.
>
> Commit: ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5
> Yes? with the patch above, _cpu_down() called _after_ freeze_processes() ???
perfect :)
See also my original mail and the thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/4314
> How about other kthread_stop()s ? For example, kernel/softirq.c:cpu_callback() ?
I'd they should be affected as well. For me, I guess I haven't run into
them because xfs is enough to freeze the box ;) As for Rafael, I don't
know why he isn't seeing that... I haven't been able to test this patch
on my quad powermac so far unfortunately, been sick and away from the
machine. I'll probably be able to test tomorrow.
> I think we need a general "cpu_down() after freeze" implementation,
Yeah, I'd think so.
> this is what
> Gautham and Srivatsa are working on, right?
That I don't know.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists