[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070227153616.712508c6.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:36:16 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Menuconfig has butterfly effects?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:12:42 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
> I ran "make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig", did a lot of editing, and saved
> the .config. Then I copied that to a backup, ran "make oldconfig" on the
> config I'd just saved, and compared it with the backup:
>
> --- .config 2007-02-27 18:10:01.000000000 -0500
> +++ tryit 2007-02-27 18:09:09.000000000 -0500
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> #
> # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
> # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20
> -# Tue Feb 27 18:10:01 2007
> +# Tue Feb 27 18:08:41 2007
> #
> CONFIG_X86_64=y
> CONFIG_64BIT=y
> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
> CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y
> +# CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL is not set
> +# CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set
> +# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set
> CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
> CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y
> # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC is not set
>
> The first hunk I expect, the second I did not. Anybody care to venture a
> guess why the visibility logic is unstable?
can we get .config^Wtryit ? (version 0, not version 1)
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists