linux-kernel - Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <F2D0230C-CA22-4DEF-917E-6982FA0C6171@embeddedalley.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:46:28 -0500
From:	Dan Malek <dan@...eddedalley.com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc:	Torben.Mathiasen@...com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices


On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:

> An alternative idea, which one person already shot down, was to  
> allow only 4 devices normally, but allow more devices if you use  
> udev, since udev doesn't care about minor number assignments.  This  
> eliminates the overlap and encourages people to use udev.

I'd shoot that down, too.  Using udev in an
embedded, reliable environment is very
troublesome.  Although, products I've
developed using more than 4 UARTs had
some custom /dev work done to it just
to get everything mapped.  My only
concern is we don't add a new range for
QE UARTs, that we use the same minors
for both CPM and QE.

Thanks.

	-- Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/