[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E75635.3070103@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:39:49 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: nscott@...nex.com
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, suparna@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:04:45 +0530
>> "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon coming up
>>> with. These patches implement a new system call sys_fallocate() and a
>>> new inode operation "fallocate", for persistent preallocation. The new
>>> system call, as Andrew suggested, will look like:
>>>
>>> asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len);
>> ...
>>
>> I'd agree with Eric on the "command" flag extension.
>
> Seems like a separate syscall would be better, "command" sounds
> a bit ioctl like, especially if that command is passed into the
> filesystems..
>
> cheers.
>
I'm fine with that too, I'd just like the functionality :)
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists