[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1172788855.26078.294.camel@edge>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:40:54 +1100
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@...nex.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, suparna@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:04:45 +0530
> "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon coming up
> > with. These patches implement a new system call sys_fallocate() and a
> > new inode operation "fallocate", for persistent preallocation. The new
> > system call, as Andrew suggested, will look like:
> >
> > asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len);
> ...
>
> I'd agree with Eric on the "command" flag extension.
Seems like a separate syscall would be better, "command" sounds
a bit ioctl like, especially if that command is passed into the
filesystems..
cheers.
--
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists