[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070301001708.900eb5e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:17:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: compudj@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, paulus@...ba.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, hskinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: Thread flags modified without set_thread_flag() (non
atomically)
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:23:41 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > That all looks rather deliberate.
> >
> > > powerpc/kernel/process.c: t->flags ^= (_TIF_ABI_PENDING |
> > > _TIF_32BIT);
> > >
> > > ia64/kernel/mca.c: ti->flags = _TIF_MCA_INIT;
> > >
> > > avr32/kernel/ptrace.c: ti->flags |= _TIF_BREAKPOINT;
> >
> > No, I don't immediately see anything in the flush_old_exec() code path
> > which tells us that nobody else can look up this thread_info (or be holding
> > a ref to it) in this context.
>
> Provide the counter example, what other threads of control can modify
> relevant flags while a thread is exec()'ing? It's essentially frozen
> outside of these code paths, otherwise we wouldn't be able to make all
> of these modifications to the task state.
As Mathieu points out, resched_task(), perhaps. It can be called from interrupt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists