[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070301103451.2618cc35@dhcp-252-105.norway.atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:34:51 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Thread flags modified without set_thread_flag() (non
atomically)
[trimming cc list since I'm only replying to the avr32 part]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:03:49 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:10:37 -0800 Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...gle.com> wrote:
> > avr32/kernel/ptrace.c: ti->flags |= _TIF_BREAKPOINT;
>
> No, I don't immediately see anything in the flush_old_exec() code path
> which tells us that nobody else can look up this thread_info (or be holding
> a ref to it) in this context.
>
>
> > avr32/kernel/ptrace.c: ti->flags |= TIF_SINGLE_STEP;
>
> heh. Haarvard, you got a bug.
Heh, yeah. That would indeed explain some strange gdb behaviour. It
will only trigger when single-stepping into an exception or interrupt
handler so thanks for pointing it out; I would have had a hard time
figuring it out on my own...
I don't think either of those need to be atomic though, since both of
them happen in monitor mode with interrupts disabled.
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists