linux-kernel - belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <200703020042.17902.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:42:12 -0500
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

Greetings;

I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was 
about 15 seconds longer than usual.  When it got a bash shell going I 
went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking 
90% of the cpu.  Killed it, then restarted it, but when I ran the gui 
which ran fine and then stopped the gui, the daemon once again went hog 
wild and had to be killed,  and I'm losing my kmail composer focus for 30 
seconds at a time now that amanda is making her nightly run.

There is nothing in the log about it other than from xinetd as it ran the 
amanda server stuff.

Not quite ready for prime time methinks.  Using the ck scheduler, this is 
terrible performance, virtually no multitasking.  Back to 2.6.20-ck1 in 
the morning if it lives the rest of the night.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/