| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:59:33 +1100 From: "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org> To: "Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2 On 02/03/07, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> wrote: > Greetings; > > I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was > about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I > went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking > 90% of the cpu. Killed it, then restarted it, but when I ran the gui > which ran fine and then stopped the gui, the daemon once again went hog > wild and had to be killed, and I'm losing my kmail composer focus for 30 > seconds at a time now that amanda is making her nightly run. > > There is nothing in the log about it other than from xinetd as it ran the > amanda server stuff. > > Not quite ready for prime time methinks. Using the ck scheduler, this is > terrible performance, virtually no multitasking. Back to 2.6.20-ck1 in > the morning if it lives the rest of the night. HI Gene. I'm not sure if you're saying here that the performance is terrible on 2.6.21-rc2 only with the -ck scheduler, or only 2.6.21-rc2, or that 2.6.20-ck1 is terrible or that it fixes the problem. Can you please clarify this? Regards, -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists