[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EB4FA1.7020305@tmr.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:00:49 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Stephen.Clark@...lark.us
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: warn if speed limited due to 40-wire cable (v2)
Stephen Clark wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> it seems broken to manipulate xfer_mask after returning from the
>>>> driver's ->mode_filter hook.
>>>>
>>>> this patch is more than just a speed-limited warning printk, afaics
>>>>
>>> I actually suggested that order because the only way the printk can be
>>> done correctly is for it to be the very last test made. Since the mode
>>> filter is not told what mode will be used but just subtracts modes that
>>> are not allowed this should be safe.
>>>
>>
>> Far better to have a drive which works slowly than one which works
>> unreliably.
>>
>>
>>
> That would be true if the 40 wire detection was 100% accurate!
The statement is completely correct, even though the detection may not
be. ;-)
With the current set(s) of patches to do better detection, cable
evaluation should be better. But even if not, a slow system is more
useful than one which doesn't work, crashes because of swap i/o errors, etc.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@....com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists