[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173101297.26165.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:28:17 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is
> an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to
> use int $0x80 - including sane ones like KVM. (If a hypervisor does not
> handle the VDSO properly then it can work things around via the vdso=0
> boot option. Or CONFIG_PARAVIRT should not have been merged. But in any
> case, it is a basic taste issue: we DO NOT #ifdef around core features
> like this!)
I agree with the criticism, dislike the snarly comments, and disagree
with this patch.
VDSO is only a problem if (1) the hypervisor wants to reserve the top
virtual address space (CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y), and (2) the glibc is old and
can't handle a VDSO mapped anywhere but 0xFFFFE000
(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y).
Now, KVM wants to use CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y but not reserve_top_address(),
so we should split the config option. Let's not get too excited because
we kept it simple. Patch (untested, but fairly simple) below.
BTW, I had a patch to do a runtime test (old glibc causes init to
assert, then disable vdso and try again): everyone hated it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
diff -r f75715e64a3b arch/i386/Kconfig
--- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Mar 06 00:04:50 2007 +1100
+++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Mar 06 00:20:44 2007 +1100
@@ -218,9 +218,18 @@ config PARAVIRT
However, when run without a hypervisor the kernel is
theoretically slower. If in doubt, say N.
+config RESERVE_TOP
+ bool
+ help
+ Many hypervisors want to reserve some amount of the top of
+ virtual address space. Unfortunately, old glibc needs the
+ vdso page there, so we must disable vdso if COMPAT_VDSO is
+ enabled as well as this option.
+
config VMI
bool "VMI Paravirt-ops support"
depends on PARAVIRT && !NO_HZ
+ select RESERVE_TOP
default y
help
VMI provides a paravirtualized interface to multiple hypervisors
@@ -893,9 +902,10 @@ config COMPAT_VDSO
config COMPAT_VDSO
bool "Compat VDSO support"
default y
- depends on !PARAVIRT
- help
- Map the VDSO to the predictable old-style address too.
+ help
+ Map the VDSO to the predictable old-style address too, or
+ in the case of a VMI/Xen/lguest virtualized guest, don't create
+ the VDSO at all.
---help---
Say N here if you are running a sufficiently recent glibc
version (2.3.3 or later), to remove the high-mapped
diff -r f75715e64a3b arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c Tue Mar 06 00:04:50 2007 +1100
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c Tue Mar 06 00:21:42 2007 +1100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* Should the kernel map a VDSO page into processes and pass its
* address down to glibc upon exec()?
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+#if defined(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) && defined(CONFIG_RESERVE_TOP)
unsigned int __read_mostly vdso_enabled = 0;
#else
unsigned int __read_mostly vdso_enabled = 1;
diff -r f75715e64a3b arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c
--- a/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c Tue Mar 06 00:04:50 2007 +1100
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c Tue Mar 06 00:06:00 2007 +1100
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void reserve_top_address(unsigned long r
BUG_ON(fixmaps > 0);
printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving virtual address space above 0x%08x\n",
(int)-reserve);
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO
+#ifndef CONFIG_RESERVE_TOP
BUG_ON(reserve != 0);
#else
__FIXADDR_TOP = -reserve - PAGE_SIZE;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists