[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173101534.26165.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:32:14 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:00 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> > but yes, i agree that the hypervisor should have the ability to patch
> > the syscall instruction of both the hypervisor interface and of the VDSO
> > interface. But this wasnt implemented like that, and the #ifdef quirk
> > just /prevents/ a sane solution like that from ever getting done the
> > right way.
> >
>
> Rusty, shouldn't this be a one-liner? No need to involve the hypervisor
> here; the guest can s/syscall/int 80/ on its vdso page like it patches
> cli and its ilk.
Probably, but this is a red herring: see previous reply. Andi was a
little overzealous w/ CONFIG_PARAVIRT & COMPAT_VDSO, that's all.
I've never thought of replacing the syscall insn. I'll see if I can
come up with a good reason to want to 8)
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists