linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070305181601.GD10193@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:16:01 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, git@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2)

On Mon, Mar 05 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >  git-bisect good      0539771d7236b425f285652f6f297cc7939c8f9a
> > 
> >  81450b73dde07f473a4a7208b209b4c8b7251d90 is first bad commit
> 
> I have confirmed these two on my system.

BTW, the key here seems to be CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE, at least that
is my current guess looking at the config options I still need to test
whether they make a difference. Either that, or the vmsplit option got
broken again. I'm attaching my x60 config that works for me.

-- 
Jens Axboe


Download attachment ".config" of type "application/x-config" (35723 bytes)