[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173121038.31232.1.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:57:18 -0800
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix vsyscall settimeofday
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 08:56 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I've only seen this on x86_64 .
>
> The vsyscall state only gets updated when a timer interrupts comes in . So
> if the time is set long before the next timer, there will be a period when
> a gettimeofday() won't reflect the correct time.
>
> I added an explicit update_vsyscall() during the settimeofday(), that way
> the vsyscall state doesn't get stale.
>
> Any thought John?
Oh! Yes, very good catch, Daniel!
Thanks so much!
-john
> Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/timer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.20/kernel/timer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.20.orig/kernel/timer.c
> +++ linux-2.6.20/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,8 @@ int do_settimeofday(struct timespec *tv)
> clock->error = 0;
> ntp_clear();
>
> + update_vsyscall(&xtime, clock);
> +
> write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
>
> /* signal hrtimers about time change */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists