[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703062131.23465.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:31:22 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
Hi,
On Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:30, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > For 2.6.21-rc1 I've invented the appended workaround (works for me, waiting for
> > Johannes to confirm it works for him too), but I think we need something better
> > for -mm and future kernels.
>
> Finally I could get back to this but after reading the thread I figured
> it might not be necessary to test this. Please let me know ASAP if you
> want this patch tested as well or it'll take quite a long time (going
> skiing for a week on Saturday)
I think it won't be necessary.
For now, we have decided to make the workqueues nonfreezable (the patch for
that has already been merged, AFAICT).
> In any case, I made the two xfs workqueues non-freezable and everything
> on my quad powermac works again, I also couldn't detect any filesystem
> correction.
Good, thanks for the confirmation.
> I wanted to adapt the BUG_ON(block IO not from suspend code)
> patch from suspend2 but haven't gotten around to it yet.
That might be a good idea for other reasons too, but I'd prefer WARN_ON()
instead of BUG_ON() when you're at it. ;-)
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists