[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173258239.4998.79.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:03:59 +1000
From: Shane <ibm-main@....com.au>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: riel@...hat.com, vatsa@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
balbir@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru,
linux-mm@...ck.org, menage@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org,
clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller
reclaim
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 16:43 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Please let me know if so see any problem running the patch. The
> patches are against 2.6.20 only since dependent patches are at that level.
My problem - a bad copy of the patch. It patches o.k.
However, it fails to compile vmscan. This looks a bit dodgy;
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
@@ -1470,11 +1494,13 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
int pass;
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
struct scan_control sc = {
- .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+ .gfp_mask = GFdefined(CONFIG_CONTAINER_PAGECACHE_ACCT)
+P_KERNEL,
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I deleted what looks like an over-enthusiastic "copy-and-paste", and it
compiled o.k.
Testing continues.
Shane ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists