[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070307093518.GB8424@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:35:18 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
* Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com> wrote:
> * Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> >> After these patches, I don't think there is too much burden. The main
> >> thing left really is just the objrmap stuff, but that is just handled
> >> with a minimal 'dumb' algorithm that doesn't cost much.
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:22:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok. What do you think about the sys_remap_file_pages_prot() thing that
> > Paolo has done in a nicely split up form - does that complicate things
> > in any fundamental way? That is what is useful to UML.
>
> Oracle would love it. You don't want to know how far back I've been
> asked to backport that.
ok, cool! Then the first step would be for you to talk to Paolo and to
pick up the patches, review them, nurse it in -mm, etc. Suffering in
silence is just a pointless act of masochism, not an efficient
upstream-merge tactic ;-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists