[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070307093848.GC8609@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:38:48 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:26:38AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:18:23 +0100 Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > msync breakage is bad, but otherwise I don't know that we care about
> > dirty page writeout efficiency.
>
> Well. We made so many changes to support the synchronous
> dirty-the-page-when-we-dirty-the-pte thing that I'm rather doubtful that
> the old-style approach still works. It might seem to, most of the time.
> But if it _is_ subtly broken, boy it's going to take a long time for us to
> find out.
I can't think of anything that should have caused breakage (except for
the msync thing). We're still careful about not dropping pte dirty bits.
> > But I think we discovered that those msync changes are bogus anyway
> > becuase there is a small race window where pte could be dirtied without
> > page being set dirty?
>
> Dunno, I don't recall that. We dirty the page before the pte...
I don't think it isn't really that simple. There is a big comment in
clear_page_dirty_for_io.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists