[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703070938470.12283@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:42:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] signalfd v1 - signalfd core ...
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Then, of course, you have to think about how to get the siginfo_t out to
> the user process. Do you just return it from the read after the read
> that returns the signal number? If so, you need to know if the process
> did a compat read syscall read or a normal one ...
It can be a read(2) of a structure that does not need compat. It must be
that way, because compat-on-read are out of question.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists