[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070307.160740.77057241.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:07:40 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eparis@...isplace.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, vyekkirala@...stedcs.com,
cxzhang@...son.ibm.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add xfrm policy change auditing to pfkey_spdget
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:43:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:51:24 -0500
>
> > pfkey_spdget neither had an LSM security hook nor auditing for the
> > removal of xfrm_policy structs. The security hook was added when it was
> > moved into xfrm_policy_byid instead of the callers to that function by
> > my earlier patch and this patch adds the auditing hooks as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
>
> Applied.
This patch was missing an openning brace on the "if (delete)" line.
Eric you don't post patches without at least compile testing
them now do you? :-)
I fixed this up, but I will just kick it back to you next time,
and I will likely growl very loudly in your general direction
too. ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists