[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070308171752.GN6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:17:52 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, safford@...son.ibm.com,
serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zohar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
* Serge E. Hallyn (serue@...ibm.com) wrote:
> It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a no-go.
>
> Options?
There's too much dup because stuff like above is just access control
not integrity measurement. Need to break off the parts that really
are different. But I don't have a great option offhand, I recognize
the complication.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists