[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33939.11500.qm@web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:30:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, safford@...son.ibm.com,
serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zohar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> It's unfortunate, agreed, but
>
> use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> no-go.
You're going to have to justify this assertion.
I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
claims of SELinux.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists