linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:42:02 -0800
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, safford@...son.ibm.com,
	serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zohar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks

* Casey Schaufler (casey@...aufler-ca.com) wrote:
> 
> --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> > It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> > 
> > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> > no-go.
> 
> You're going to have to justify this assertion.
> I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
> LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
> claims of SELinux.

Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA
as LSM because it was not doing access control,
rather integrity measurements.  It's all in
somewhere the archives.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/