[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070309121708.43758c4c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:17:08 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, serue@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] revoke: core code
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:15:15 +0200 (EET)
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>
> The revokeat(2) and frevoke(2) system calls invalidate open file
> descriptors and shared mappings of an inode. After an successful
> revocation, operations on file descriptors fail with the EBADF or
> ENXIO error code for regular and device files,
> respectively. Attempting to read from or write to a revoked mapping
> causes SIGBUS.
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> +static ssize_t revoked_file_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
> + const struct iovec *iov,
> + unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)
> +{
> + return -EBADF;
> +}
Do we need both -EBADF and -EXNIO versions. It is hard to tell from
existing OS's as they don't support revoke of files just special files ?
> +static ssize_t revoked_special_file_read(struct file *filp, char __user * buf,
> + size_t size, loff_t * ppos)
> +{
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
Bezerkly Unix returns 0 for the special file read case
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists